Increasingly, technology and methods are being used to streamline asylum procedures. These types of range from biometric matching applications that assess iris runs and finger prints to internet directories for asylum seekers and asile to chatbots to help people register protection circumstances. These tools are created to make that easier with respect to states and agencies to process asylum applications, especially as much systems are slowed www.ascella-llc.com/ down due to the COVID-19 outbreak and increasing levels of compelled displacement.
But they raise a host of human rights concerns. Some examples are privacy concerns, opaque decision-making, and the potential for biases or equipment errors that may lead to discriminatory outcomes. Additionally they pose significant complications to migrants and refugees, who will often be already disenfranchised and insecure.
Ozkul’s homework explores the ways in which fresh technologies may be used to verify details and narratives of migrants, allowing them to improve their asylum application process. It also looks at the ways by which these systems can create a certain informational space around migrant workers, and how that they configure their subjecthood. Following Foucault, this girl argues that such algorithms are both territorial and institutional. For example , eye scanning algorithms can be seen while an institutional technology, as they require the migrant to enter a specific territory in order to be recognised; while suggestion algorithms are industrial and global in their results, configuring matters as consumers.
As a result, they enact a particular form of hegemonic power above displaced persons. This is especially true offered the current contest to the bottom level in asylum policy : with some countries offering offers like the Nansen passport to assist in cachette resettling and others imposing restrictive plans that block their access to location and power them on dangerous and deadly travels.
0